People v. Malinski, Rudish

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Malinski, Rudish

56 N.E.2d 107, 292 N.Y. 686, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1841

DecidedMay 18, 1944

StatusPublished

This text of 56 N.E.2d 107 (People v. Malinski, Rudish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Malinski, Rudish, 56 N.E.2d 107, 292 N.Y. 686, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1841 (N.Y. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

MOTIONS by appellants to amend the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested, and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following:

"Questions under the constitution of the United States were presented and necessarily passed upon.

"The defendant Rudish contended that the admission of the confession of his co-defendant Malinski in evidence against Malinski was a denial to the defendant Rudish of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the constitution of the United States.

"The defendant Malinski contended that the admission in evidence of his alleged confession and his identification of the `murder car' and his description of the events at the scene of the murder violated his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the constitution of the United States.

"This court held that the rights of neither defendant under the Fourteenth Amendment to the constitution of the United States had been violated or denied." (See 292 N.Y. 360.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI