People v. Malik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Malik

6 A.D.3d 461, 773 N.Y.S.2d 885

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 5, 2004·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McKay, J.), rendered March 11, 2002, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree and burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his waiver of his right to appeal was voluntary, knowing, and intelligent, and encompassed the denial of those branches of his motion which were to suppress identification testimony and physical evidence (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831 [1999]; People v Miller, 306 AD2d 294 [2003]; People v Hussain, 309 AD2d 818 [2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 598 [2004]). Altman, J.P., H. Miller, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McKay, J.), rendered March 11, 2002, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree and burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his waiver of his right to appeal was voluntary, knowing, and intelligent, and encompassed the denial of those branches of his motion which were to suppress identification testimony and physical evidence (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831 [1999]; People v Miller, 306 AD2d 294 [2003]; People v Hussain, 309 AD2d 818 [2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 598 [2004]). Altman, J.P., H. Miller, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.

People v. Malik, 6 A.D.3d 461, 773 N.Y.S.2d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

6 A.D.3d 461 (People v. Malik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related