People v. Maldonado

212 A.D.2d 808, 624 N.Y.S.2d 849
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 27, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 212 A.D.2d 808 (People v. Maldonado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Maldonado, 212 A.D.2d 808, 624 N.Y.S.2d 849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Koch, J.), rendered October 16, 1992, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[809]*809The defendant’s contention that the introduction of rebuttal testimony was improper was unpreserved for appellate review because no objection to this evidence was made (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, the testimony was not collateral because it went to refute the testimony of the defense witnesses (see, People v Harris, 57 NY2d 335, 345, cert denied 460 US 1047).

The defendant’s challenges to two of the People’s summation comments were unpreserved for appellate review and in any event do not warrant reversal (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 241-242). Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hay
73 A.D.3d 1081 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Ferguson
15 A.D.3d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 A.D.2d 808, 624 N.Y.S.2d 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-maldonado-nyappdiv-1995.