People v. Maldonado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Maldonado

65 A.D.2d 519, 411 N.Y.S.2d 185, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13099

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 12, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 65 A.D.2d 519 (People v. Maldonado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Maldonado, 65 A.D.2d 519, 411 N.Y.S.2d 185, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered December 17, 1974, convicting defendant after jury trial of criminal sale of a controlled substance, first degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance, first and third degrees, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the count of criminal possession of a controlled substance, third degree, and otherwise affirmed. On the facts of this case, conviction of the counts charging sale and possession with intent to sell, included the lesser count of possession, third degree. As the People concede, the lesser count should be dismissed as it was in the case of the codefendant (People v Santiago, 55 AD2d 584, affd 44 NY2d 924). We have examined the other contentions advanced by appellant and find them without merit. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Evans, Lane and Sullivan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered December 17, 1974, convicting defendant after jury trial of criminal sale of a controlled substance, first degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance, first and third degrees, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the count of criminal possession of a controlled substance, third degree, and otherwise affirmed. On the facts of this case, conviction of the counts charging sale and possession with intent to sell, included the lesser count of possession, third degree. As the People concede, the lesser count should be dismissed as it was in the case of the codefendant (People v Santiago, 55 AD2d 584, affd 44 NY2d 924). We have examined the other contentions advanced by appellant and find them without merit. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Evans, Lane and Sullivan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.D.2d 519, 411 N.Y.S.2d 185, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-maldonado-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack