People v. Malawich

2021 NY Slip Op 05789, 198 A.D.3d 545, 152 N.Y.S.3d 805
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 21, 2021
DocketInd No. 4509/18 Appeal No. 14458 Case No. 2020-01374
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 05789 (People v. Malawich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Malawich, 2021 NY Slip Op 05789, 198 A.D.3d 545, 152 N.Y.S.3d 805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v Malawich (2021 NY Slip Op 05789)
People v Malawich
2021 NY Slip Op 05789
Decided on October 21, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: October 21, 2021
Before: Renwick, J.P., Kapnick, Scarpulla, Rodriguez, Higgitt, JJ.

Ind No. 4509/18 Appeal No. 14458 Case No. 2020-01374

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

David Malawich, Defendant-Appellant.


Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jillian Lewis of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Mark R. Dwyer, J.), rendered January 17, 2020, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth and seventh degrees, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender previously convicted of a violent felony, to an aggregate term of 4 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the prison component of the sentence to 3½ years, and otherwise affirmed.

We find that defendant's request for self-representation was not unequivocal, as required (see People v Silburn, 31 NY3d 144, 150 [2018]). We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: October 21, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Silburn
98 N.E.3d 696 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 05789, 198 A.D.3d 545, 152 N.Y.S.3d 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-malawich-nyappdiv-2021.