People v. Major

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Major

116 A.D.2d 594, 497 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51449

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 116 A.D.2d 594 (People v. Major) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Major, 116 A.D.2d 594, 497 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51449 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), rendered June 21, 1984, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and attempted assault in the first degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant concedes in his brief that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree. He argues, however, that his conviction on the two assault counts cannot be sustained because the People failed to disprove his defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, however, as we must, we find that defendant’s guilt of these counts was proven beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied — US —, 105 S Ct 327; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). There is simply no reasonable view of the evidence that would support [595]*595a defense of justification (see, People v Alston, 104 AD2d 653). Defendant’s failure to retreat when he was able to do so, and the number of stab wounds sustained by both victims, negates the essential elements of the defense (see, Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [a]; People v Doctor, 98 AD2d 780, 781; People v Alston, supra; People v Collice, 41 NY2d 906, 907).

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit. Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), rendered June 21, 1984, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and attempted assault in the first degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant concedes in his brief that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support his conviction of manslaughter in the first degree. He argues, however, that his conviction on the two assault counts cannot be sustained because the People failed to disprove his defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, however, as we must, we find that defendant’s guilt of these counts was proven beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied — US —, 105 S Ct 327; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). There is simply no reasonable view of the evidence that would support [595]*595a defense of justification (see, People v Alston, 104 AD2d 653). Defendant’s failure to retreat when he was able to do so, and the number of stab wounds sustained by both victims, negates the essential elements of the defense (see, Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [a]; People v Doctor, 98 AD2d 780, 781; People v Alston, supra; People v Collice, 41 NY2d 906, 907).

We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit. Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 A.D.2d 594, 497 N.Y.S.2d 454, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-major-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack