People v. Majid
This text of 98 A.D.3d 897 (People v. Majid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[898]*898Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J.), entered on or about November 12, 2009, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The record supports the court’s discretionary upward departure to level three. The court properly determined that although defendant received points relating to his use of violence in the commission of the underlying sex crime, the risk assessment instrument did not adequately take into account the extreme brutality of the crime, which led to convictions of attempted murder in the second degree, sodomy in the first degree, and robbery in the first degree (see e.g. People v Guasp, 95 AD3d 608 [1st Dept 2012]). These aggravating factors outweighed the mitigating factors cited by defendant. Concur— Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Freedman and Richter, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 A.D.3d 897, 950 N.Y.S.2d 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-majid-nyappdiv-2012.