People v. Majid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Majid

48 A.D.2d 885, 372 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10140

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.2d 885 (People v. Majid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Majid, 48 A.D.2d 885, 372 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County, imposed December 11, 1973, upon his conviction of possession of weapons and dangerous instruments and appliances, as a misdemeanor (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being a term of one year on each count, to be served concurrently. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to a three-year period of probation and case remanded to Criminal Term to fix the period and conditions of probation and for proceedings to direct appellant to surrender himself to said court in order that execution of the sentence be commenced or resumed (CPL 460.50, subd 5). Upon our consideration of the probation report dated May 21, 1975, we believe that a sentence of probation is appropriate. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County, imposed December 11, 1973, upon his conviction of possession of weapons and dangerous instruments and appliances, as a misdemeanor (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being a term of one year on each count, to be served concurrently. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to a three-year period of probation and case remanded to Criminal Term to fix the period and conditions of probation and for proceedings to direct appellant to surrender himself to said court in order that execution of the sentence be commenced or resumed (CPL 460.50, subd 5). Upon our consideration of the probation report dated May 21, 1975, we believe that a sentence of probation is appropriate. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 885, 372 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-majid-nyappdiv-1975.