People v. Maize

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Maize

226 A.D.2d 654, 641 N.Y.S.2d 561, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4442

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 22, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 226 A.D.2d 654 (People v. Maize) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Maize, 226 A.D.2d 654, 641 N.Y.S.2d 561, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County [655]*655(DeRiggi, J.), rendered October 14, 1994, convicting him of assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and obstructing governmental administration in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In consideration of his plea of guilty, the defendant withdrew all motions "decided and undecided”. He thus waived his right to challenge on appeal the court’s denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence (see, People v Sebastian, 197 AD2d 647; People v Lantigua, 179 AD2d 826). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Hart and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County [655]*655(DeRiggi, J.), rendered October 14, 1994, convicting him of assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and obstructing governmental administration in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In consideration of his plea of guilty, the defendant withdrew all motions "decided and undecided”. He thus waived his right to challenge on appeal the court’s denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence (see, People v Sebastian, 197 AD2d 647; People v Lantigua, 179 AD2d 826). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Hart and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 A.D.2d 654, 641 N.Y.S.2d 561, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-maize-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack