People v. Maisonet

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Maisonet

46 A.D.3d 373, 848 N.Y.S.2d 61

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A.D.3d 373 (People v. Maisonet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Maisonet, 46 A.D.3d 373, 848 N.Y.S.2d 61 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered June 22, 2005, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted murder in the second degree and sentencing him to 12 years, plus five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The record does not establish that defendant’s sentence was based on any improper criteria and we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Defendant’s arguments concerning the manner in which postrelease supervision was imposed do not warrant any remedy. The court actually addressed postrelease supervision at sentencing (compare People v Williams, 44 AD3d 335 [2007]), as well as during the plea proceedings and by way of the commitment sheet. Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Williams, McGuire and Kavanagh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered June 22, 2005, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted murder in the second degree and sentencing him to 12 years, plus five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The record does not establish that defendant’s sentence was based on any improper criteria and we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Defendant’s arguments concerning the manner in which postrelease supervision was imposed do not warrant any remedy. The court actually addressed postrelease supervision at sentencing (compare People v Williams, 44 AD3d 335 [2007]), as well as during the plea proceedings and by way of the commitment sheet. Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Williams, McGuire and Kavanagh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.3d 373, 848 N.Y.S.2d 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-maisonet-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack