People v. Mahar
This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 00651 (People v. Mahar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Mahar |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 00651 |
| Decided on February 5, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 5, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
3 KA 20-00289
v
NICHOLAS B. MAHAR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
ANDREW D. CORREIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (BRIDGET L. FIELD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from an order of the Wayne County Court (John B. Nesbitt, J.), entered August 15, 2019. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Wayne County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.) after a conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 [3]). We agree with defendant to the extent that he contends that County Court made only general and conclusory findings of fact and conclusions of law. We are thus unable to conduct a meaningful review of the court's risk level assessment, particularly with respect to the court's assessment of points for risk factors 3, 4, and 12 (see People v Leopold, 13 NY3d 923, 924 [2010]; People v Dean, 169 AD3d 1414, 1415 [4th Dept 2019]; People v Cameron, 87 AD3d 1366, 1366-1367 [4th Dept 2011]). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision, and remit the matter to County Court to prepare statutorily compliant findings of fact and conclusions of law (see Correction Law §§ 168-d [3]; 168-n [3]).
Entered: February 5, 2021
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2021 NY Slip Op 00651, 137 N.Y.S.3d 758, 191 A.D.3d 1237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mahar-nyappdiv-2021.