People v. Maguire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Maguire

215 A.D.2d 251, 627 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5339

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 215 A.D.2d 251 (People v. Maguire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Maguire, 215 A.D.2d 251, 627 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5339 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Sheindlin, J.), rendered May 28, 1992, convicting defendant, after a guilty plea of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2V2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s contentions, we find that defendant’s plea to robbery in the third degree was knowing and intelligent. Nor is there any support in the record for defendant’s contention that an indictment had been filed prior to the time he executed a waiver of indictment.

Lastly, the record reveals that defendant’s counsel had no reason to object to the plea bargain, and thus it cannot be said that defendant did not receive the effective assistance of counsel. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Sheindlin, J.), rendered May 28, 1992, convicting defendant, after a guilty plea of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2V2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s contentions, we find that defendant’s plea to robbery in the third degree was knowing and intelligent. Nor is there any support in the record for defendant’s contention that an indictment had been filed prior to the time he executed a waiver of indictment.

Lastly, the record reveals that defendant’s counsel had no reason to object to the plea bargain, and thus it cannot be said that defendant did not receive the effective assistance of counsel. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D.2d 251, 627 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-maguire-nyappdiv-1995.