People v. Maggio
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), rendered July 1, 1999, convicting him of conspiracy in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to [592]*592withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
The defendant has not, nor could he have, raised any non-frivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
304 A.D.2d 591 (People v. Maggio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.