People v. Maggio

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Maggio

186 N.E.2d 809, 12 N.Y.2d 789

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 1, 1962

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 N.E.2d 809 (People v. Maggio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Maggio, 186 N.E.2d 809, 12 N.Y.2d 789 (N.Y. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed upon the dissenting opinion of Beldock, P. J., at the Appellate Division and the judgment of the County Court of Rockland County reinstated. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Van Voorhis and Burke. Judges Fuld, Froessel and Foster dissent and vote to affirm in the following memorandum: We believe that the Appellate Division was correct in reversing defendant’s conviction on the authority of People v. Randall (9 N Y 2d 413). In our view, we may reach a different conclusion only by repudiating our carefully considered decision in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed upon the dissenting opinion of Beldock, P. J., at the Appellate Division and the judgment of the County Court of Rockland County reinstated. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Van Voorhis and Burke. Judges Fuld, Froessel and Foster dissent and vote to affirm in the following memorandum: We believe that the Appellate Division was correct in reversing defendant’s conviction on the authority of People v. Randall (9 N Y 2d 413). In our view, we may reach a different conclusion only by repudiating our carefully considered decision in that case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 N.E.2d 809, 12 N.Y.2d 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-maggio-ny-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack