People v. Magaril

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Magaril

291 N.E.2d 583, 31 N.Y.2d 802, 339 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1038

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 2, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 291 N.E.2d 583 (People v. Magaril) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Magaril, 291 N.E.2d 583, 31 N.Y.2d 802, 339 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1038 (N.Y. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed. There was adequate evidence supportive of the search warrants and there was probable cause for defendant’s arrest and the seizure of his briefcase, without reference, in either case, to the evidence recorded by the pen register. (For description thereof, see United States v. Covello, 410 F. 2d 536, 542, n. 7 [2d Cir., 1969], cert. den. 396 U. S. 879.)

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Bxjrkb, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and GresojL

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed. There was adequate evidence supportive of the search warrants and there was probable cause for defendant’s arrest and the seizure of his briefcase, without reference, in either case, to the evidence recorded by the pen register. (For description thereof, see United States v. Covello, 410 F. 2d 536, 542, n. 7 [2d Cir., 1969], cert. den. 396 U. S. 879.)

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Bxjrkb, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and GresojL

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 N.E.2d 583, 31 N.Y.2d 802, 339 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-magaril-ny-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack