People v. Magaril

291 N.E.2d 583, 31 N.Y.2d 802, 339 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1038
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 2, 1972·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed. There was adequate evidence supportive of the search warrants and there was probable cause for defendant’s arrest and the seizure of his briefcase, without reference, in either case, to the evidence recorded by the pen register. (For description thereof, see United States v. Covello, 410 F. 2d 536, 542, n. 7 [2d Cir., 1969], cert. den. 396 U. S. 879.)

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Bxjrkb, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and GresojL

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Magaril, 291 N.E.2d 583, 31 N.Y.2d 802, 339 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1038 (N.Y. 1972).

291 N.E.2d 583 (People v. Magaril) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Alaxanian
76 A.D.2d 187 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)