People v. Madore

182 A.D.2d 1092, 586 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6962

This text of 182 A.D.2d 1092 (People v. Madore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Madore, 182 A.D.2d 1092, 586 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the guilty verdict on the burglary second degree count of the indictment is contrary to the weight of evidence. We conclude that the trial court properly weighed the conflicting evidence and found in the People’s favor (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Defendant’s sentence is not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Dadd, J. — Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present —Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 A.D.2d 1092, 586 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-madore-nyappdiv-1992.