People v. Madison

2025 NY Slip Op 05102
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 24, 2025
DocketInd. No. 72191/21
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 05102 (People v. Madison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Madison, 2025 NY Slip Op 05102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Madison (2025 NY Slip Op 05102)

People v Madison
2025 NY Slip Op 05102
Decided on September 24, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on September 24, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
PAUL WOOTEN
CARL J. LANDICINO
DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ.

2023-02169
(Ind. No. 72191/21)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Jahrell Madison, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Joshua M. Levine of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Melissa Owen of counsel; Jordan Najah on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Eugene M. Guarino, J.), rendered February 16, 2023, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating the imposition of a mandatory surcharge and fees; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

"Criminal Procedure Law § 420.35(2-a) permits the waiver of surcharges and fees for individuals, like the defendant, who were less than 21 years old at the time of the subject crime" (People v Cabrera, 222 AD3d 878, 879). Pursuant to the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction, and as consented to by the People, we modify the judgment by vacating so much of the sentence as imposed a mandatory surcharge and fees (see CPL 420.35[2-a][c]; People v Odesanya, 225 AD3d 631, 632).

DILLON, J.P., WOOTEN, LANDICINO and GOLIA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 420.35
New York CPL § 420.35
§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 05102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-madison-nyappdiv-2025.