People v. Madden

112 A.D.3d 740, 976 N.Y.S.2d 408
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 11, 2013·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the

[741]*741defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered November 30, 2011, convicting him of criminal sexual act in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the County Court’s failure to inform him of possible confinement or supervision pursuant to the Sex Offender Management and Treatment Act (Mental Hygiene Law § 10.01 et seq., as added by L 2007, ch 7) (hereinafter SOMTA) rendered his plea of guilty involuntary (see People v Perez, 51 AD3d 1043 [2008]). However, the defendant failed to preserve this contention for appellate review, since he never moved to withdraw his plea. In any event, possible confinement or supervision pursuant to SOMTA are collateral consequences of the defendant’s plea of guilty, and the County Court’s failure to discuss those possibilities prior to accepting the defendant’s plea of guilty did not render the plea involuntary in this case (see People v Harnett, 16 NY3d 200, 205 [2011]; cf. People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 244 [2005]). Dillon, J.R, Leventhal, Chambers and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Madden, 112 A.D.3d 740, 976 N.Y.S.2d 408 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

112 A.D.3d 740 (People v. Madden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Walters
2025 NY Slip Op 07344 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. O'Neill
2019 NY Slip Op 4055 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Miller
2018 NY Slip Op 7757 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Mosqueda
2018 NY Slip Op 3709 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)