People v. Maddaus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Maddaus

5 A.D.2d 886, 172 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6540

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 886 (People v. Maddaus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Maddaus, 5 A.D.2d 886, 172 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6540 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal (1) from a judgment of the County Court, Queens County, convicting appellant, after trial, of violating section 1694 of the Penal Law (prisoner escaping), as a felony, and sentencing him to serve from six to seven years, to be served consecutively to another sentence imposed on the same date (see People v. Metz, 5 A D 2d 886), (2) from said sentence, and (3) from any and all orders entered in connection therewith. Appellant contends that he was led to, and actually did, believe that his detention, prior to the escape, was for a misdemeanor. Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the sentence or from the intermediate orders, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction.

Present-—■ Nolan, P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal (1) from a judgment of the County Court, Queens County, convicting appellant, after trial, of violating section 1694 of the Penal Law (prisoner escaping), as a felony, and sentencing him to serve from six to seven years, to be served consecutively to another sentence imposed on the same date (see People v. Metz, 5 A D 2d 886), (2) from said sentence, and (3) from any and all orders entered in connection therewith. Appellant contends that he was led to, and actually did, believe that his detention, prior to the escape, was for a misdemeanor. Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the sentence or from the intermediate orders, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction.

Present-—■ Nolan, P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 886, 172 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-maddaus-nyappdiv-1958.