People v. Maddaus

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Maddaus

152 N.E.2d 537, 4 N.Y.2d 1003

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 25, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 152 N.E.2d 537 (People v. Maddaus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Maddaus, 152 N.E.2d 537, 4 N.Y.2d 1003 (N.Y. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

[1005]*1005Order affirmed. We agree with the Appellate Division that the evidence presented at the trial fails to establish that the defendant committed the offense charged against him; by his conduct, he did not ‘ ‘ interfere with or obstruct ’ ’ an inspector, within the meaning of section 186 of the Sanitary Code of New York City. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Fboessel, Van Voobhis and Bueke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1005]*1005Order affirmed. We agree with the Appellate Division that the evidence presented at the trial fails to establish that the defendant committed the offense charged against him; by his conduct, he did not ‘ ‘ interfere with or obstruct ’ ’ an inspector, within the meaning of section 186 of the Sanitary Code of New York City. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Fboessel, Van Voobhis and Bueke.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 N.E.2d 537, 4 N.Y.2d 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-maddaus-ny-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack