People v. Macuil
Opinion
| People v Macuil |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 05219 |
| Decided on September 21, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on September 21, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J.
ROBERT J. MILLER
LARA J. GENOVESI
LILLIAN WAN, JJ.
2006-00676
(Ind. No. 8156/04)
v
Esteban Macuil, appellant.
Esteban Macuil, Otisville, NY, appellant pro se.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Anthea H. Bruffee of counsel), for respondent.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (David P. Greenberg of counsel), former appellate counsel.
DECISION & ORDER
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 24, 2009 (People v Macuil, 67 AD3d 1025), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 12, 2006.
ORDERED that the application is denied.
The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).
LASALLE, P.J., MILLER, GENOVESI and WAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
208 A.D.3d 1252 (People v. Macuil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.