People v. Mack

195 A.D.2d 485, 601 N.Y.S.2d 817
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 6, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered March 12, 1991, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Miller, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the police officer’s testimony at the suppression hearing was inherently incredible and patently tailored to meet constitutional objections is based upon mere conjecture. Therefore, the findings of the hearing court as to the police officer’s credibility will not be disturbed (see, People v Concepcion, 38 NY2d 211; People v Ennis, 158 AD2d 467; People v Villa, 156 AD2d 402; People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mack, 195 A.D.2d 485, 601 N.Y.S.2d 817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

195 A.D.2d 485 (People v. Mack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Curry
213 A.D.2d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)