People v. Mack

157 A.D.2d 673, 549 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 267
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 8, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 157 A.D.2d 673 (People v. Mack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Mack, 157 A.D.2d 673, 549 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 267 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), rendered September 17, 1987, convicting him of burglary in the first degree and robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find that the defendant was not denied his constitutional right of confrontation by the court’s compliance with defense counsel’s express requests made in the presence of the defendant, to excuse the defendant from portions of the pretrial hearing and from the missing witness hearing in order to prevent the complaining witnesses from viewing him, under suggestive circumstances, prior to any in-court identification (see, People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 139; People v James, 100 AD2d 552). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Pierre
161 A.D.2d 810 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 A.D.2d 673, 549 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mack-nyappdiv-1990.