People v. Mack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Mack

81 A.D.2d 925, 440 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11652

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 81 A.D.2d 925 (People v. Mack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Mack, 81 A.D.2d 925, 440 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 23, 1979, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, rape in the first degree, unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, assault in the third degree and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentences. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentences for rape in the first degree and burglary in the first degree to concurrent terms of imprisonment of from three to nine years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The sentences were excessive to the extent indicated herein. Ti-tone, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 23, 1979, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, rape in the first degree, unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, assault in the third degree and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentences. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentences for rape in the first degree and burglary in the first degree to concurrent terms of imprisonment of from three to nine years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The sentences were excessive to the extent indicated herein. Ti-tone, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 925, 440 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mack-nyappdiv-1981.