People v. MacK
935 N.E.2d 801, 15 N.Y.3d 835
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. MacK. Read the opinion of the Court — 18 N.Y.3d 929 →
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed. Defendant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see People v Borrell, 12 NY3d 365, 369 [2009]).
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. MacK, 935 N.E.2d 801, 15 N.Y.3d 835 (N.Y. 2010).
935 N.E.2d 801 (People v. MacK) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Borrell
909 N.E.2d 559 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)