People v. MacFarlane

140 A.D.3d 1089, 33 N.Y.S.3d 738
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 22, 2016·No. 2014-01551·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cohen, J.), rendered January 14, 2014, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

*1090 Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 340-341 [2015]). The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive and those contentions raised in his pro se supplemental brief, except for the contention, in effect, concerning the legality of his sentence (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]).

To the extent that the defendant claims in his pro se supplemental brief that the sentence imposed exceeded the maximum allowable sentence for manslaughter in the first degree, such claim is without merit (see Penal Law §§ 70.00 [2] [a]; [3] [a] [i]; 70.45 [2] [f]).

Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Austin and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. MacFarlane, 140 A.D.3d 1089, 33 N.Y.S.3d 738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

140 A.D.3d 1089 (People v. MacFarlane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)