People v. Mabry

236 Cal. App. 2d 402, 46 Cal. Rptr. 92, 1965 Cal. App. LEXIS 833
California Court of Appeal·Decided August 6, 1965·No. Crim. No. 2146·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BROWN (Gerald), P. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying a writ of error coram nobis. This court’s offer to appoint counsel upon appeal was refused by defendant.

Defendant contends his conviction for receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496) was based solely on a plea of guilty which was procured by coercion and duress, and violated due process as in People v. Trout, 54 Cal.2d 576 [6 Cal.Rptr. 759, 354 P.2d 231, 80 A.L.R.2d 1418], (confession obtained by improper police pressure on accused via his [403] wife). Defendant, represented by counsel, pleaded guilty in January I960; no appeal was taken from the judgment. In August 1964, the petition for writ of error coram nobis was filed.

“Coram nobis is not the proper vehicle for vindicating constitutional rights; that is a function of motion for new trial, appeal or habeas corpus (People v. Adamson, supra, at page 327.)” (People v. Ayala, 138 Cal.App.2d 243, 246 [291 P.2d 517].) See People v. Adamson, 34 Cal.2d 320, 327, 338 [210 P.2d 13].

The order is affirmed.

Coughlin, J., and Whelan, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mabry, 236 Cal. App. 2d 402, 46 Cal. Rptr. 92, 1965 Cal. App. LEXIS 833 (Cal. Ct. App. 1965).

236 Cal. App. 2d 402 (People v. Mabry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Williams
238 Cal. App. 2d 585 (California Court of Appeal, 1965)