People v. Lynn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lynn

20 A.D.2d 931, 251 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3956

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 931 (People v. Lynn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lynn, 20 A.D.2d 931, 251 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3956 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant: (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 22, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of knowingly concealing and withholding stolen property, and of petit larceny, and imposing sentence for the first crime and- suspending sentence for the second; and (2) “from each and every intermediate order” as well as from an “ order denying defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment.” Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Defendant has abandoned Ms appeal from the intermediate orders, including the order denying the motion in arrest of judgment (see 37 Misc 2d 461, treating such motion as one for a new trial). In any event, no separate appeal lies from such orders, which we have nevertheless reviewed on the appeal from the judgment (Code Grim. Pro., § 517, subd. 3). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant: (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 22, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of knowingly concealing and withholding stolen property, and of petit larceny, and imposing sentence for the first crime and- suspending sentence for the second; and (2) “from each and every intermediate order” as well as from an “ order denying defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment.” Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Defendant has abandoned Ms appeal from the intermediate orders, including the order denying the motion in arrest of judgment (see 37 Misc 2d 461, treating such motion as one for a new trial). In any event, no separate appeal lies from such orders, which we have nevertheless reviewed on the appeal from the judgment (Code Grim. Pro., § 517, subd. 3). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 931, 251 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lynn-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack