People v. Lyng
This text of 178 A.D.2d 959 (People v. Lyng) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: None of the issues raised by defendant warrants reversal. The trial court did not err in making its Sandoval ruling; the verdict was supported by sufficient evi[960]*960dence and accorded with the weight of the evidence; defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the court’s instruction on interested witnesses unfairly singled out defendant; and the sentence was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Jefferson County Court, Clary, J.— Rape, 1st Degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 A.D.2d 959, 580 N.Y.S.2d 889, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lyng-nyappdiv-1991.