People v. Luther

New York Supreme Court

People v. Luther

1 Wend. 42

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1828

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 1 Wend. 42 (People v. Luther) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Luther, 1 Wend. 42 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1828).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

The fifteen months within which the creditor had a right to redeem, expired on the thirteenth day of April, according to the principle adopted by this court in the computation of time, when an act is required by statute to be done within a specified period. (2 Cowen, 518. id. 605 and note.) The last day of the fifteen months happening on Sunday, the tender ought to have been made on Saturday, to entitle the creditor to a deed. In the case Ex parte Dodge, (7 Cowen, 147,) it was holder) that notice of appeal from a justice’s judgment given on Monday, when Sunday was the last day of giving notice, was too late. Sunday being dies non juridicus, (12 Johns. R. 178, 8 Cowen, 27,) [43]*43the sheriff was' not bound to attend to the discharge of the ordinary duties of his office on that day. Á demand on Sunday of the performance of a contract, where a previous demand was necessary to the maintenance of the action, was holden not to be good. (1 Cowen, 85.)

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

The fifteen months within which the creditor had a right to redeem, expired on the thirteenth day of April, according to the principle adopted by this court in the computation of time, when an act is required by statute to be done within a specified period. (2 Cowen, 518. id. 605 and note.) The last day of the fifteen months happening on Sunday, the tender ought to have been made on Saturday, to entitle the creditor to a deed. In the case Ex parte Dodge, (7 Cowen, 147,) it was holder) that notice of appeal from a justice’s judgment given on Monday, when Sunday was the last day of giving notice, was too late. Sunday being dies non juridicus, (12 Johns. R. 178, 8 Cowen, 27,) [43]*43the sheriff was' not bound to attend to the discharge of the ordinary duties of his office on that day. Á demand on Sunday of the performance of a contract, where a previous demand was necessary to the maintenance of the action, was holden not to be good. (1 Cowen, 85.)

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wend. 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-luther-nysupct-1828.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack