People v. Lundmark

170 A.D.2d 539

This text of 170 A.D.2d 539 (People v. Lundmark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lundmark, 170 A.D.2d 539 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered April 24, 1989, convicting her of burglary in the second degree, under Indictment No. 1227/88, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and (2) an amended judgment of the same court, also rendered April 24, 1989, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that she had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon her previous conviction of burglary in the second degree.

Ordered that the judgment and the amended judgment are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 A.D.2d 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lundmark-nyappdiv-1991.