People v. Lumpkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lumpkin

265 A.D.2d 224, 696 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10672

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 224 (People v. Lumpkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lumpkin, 265 A.D.2d 224, 696 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10672 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.), rendered October 5, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Since the record of defendant’s plea allocution confirms that he voluntarily and knowingly waived his right to appeal, appellate review of the denial of defendant’s suppression motion is foreclosed. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Wallach, Lerner, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.), rendered October 5, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Since the record of defendant’s plea allocution confirms that he voluntarily and knowingly waived his right to appeal, appellate review of the denial of defendant’s suppression motion is foreclosed. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Wallach, Lerner, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 224, 696 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lumpkin-nyappdiv-1999.