People v. Luke

281 A.D.2d 947, 725 N.Y.S.2d 153, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2804
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: In stating on the record that defendant “should serve a long time and not be released to parole until it’s absolutely mandatory,” the sentencing court did not depart from the plea bargain or in effect impose a determinate term of nine years. Thus, contrary to defendant’s contention, the indeterminate term of incarceration of 4V2 to 9 years imposed by County Court is legal (see, Penal Law § 70.04 [former (3), (4)]). Defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal, which is valid and all-encompassing on its face (see generally, People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833), bars consideration of defendant’s challenge to the severity of the sentence (see, People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Drury, J. — Attempted Sodomy, 1st Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Wisner, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Luke, 281 A.D.2d 947, 725 N.Y.S.2d 153, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

281 A.D.2d 947 (People v. Luke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Thompson
300 A.D.2d 1081 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)