People v. Lugo

2018 NY Slip Op 9020
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lugo. Read the opinion of the Court — 143 N.Y.S.3d 533
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 2018·No. 7928 2163/15·Published

Opinion

People v Lugo (2018 NY Slip Op 09020)
People v Lugo
2018 NY Slip Op 09020
Decided on December 27, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 27, 2018
Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Kapnick, Kahn, Singh, JJ.

7928 2163/15

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Hector Lugo, Defendant-Appellant.


Christina A. Swarns, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Caitlin Glass of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Kyle R. Silverstein of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Albert Lorenzo, J.), rendered July 21, 2016,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: DECEMBER 27, 2018

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lugo, 2018 NY Slip Op 9020 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

2018 NY Slip Op 9020 (People v. Lugo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431