People v. Lugo

45 A.D.3d 477, 845 N.Y.S.2d 736
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lugo. Read the opinion of the Court — 60 A.D.3d 867

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), entered on or about April 25, 2006, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant did not establish any special circumstances warranting a downward departure from his presumptive risk level (see People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). There were no mitigating factors not otherwise adequately taken into account by the guidelines. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Marlow and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lugo, 45 A.D.3d 477, 845 N.Y.S.2d 736 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

45 A.D.3d 477 (People v. Lugo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Guaman
8 A.D.3d 545 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)