People v. Lugo

170 A.D.2d 376, 566 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2314
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lugo. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 A.D.2d 502

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered June 10, 1988, convicting defendant after a jury trial of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the second degree and sentencing him, as a predicate felon, to concurrent indeterminate prison terms of from 2 Vi to 5 years and from lVi to 3 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The issue of whether the prosecutor’s remarks and summation deprived defendant of a fair trial has not been preserved for appellate review for the reason that no specific objection was taken at trial (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Rivera, 73 NY2d 941). We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions [377]*377and find them to be both unpreserved and without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lugo, 170 A.D.2d 376, 566 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2314 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

170 A.D.2d 376 (People v. Lugo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rivera
537 N.E.2d 618 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)