People v. Ludwig

262 A.D. 912, 28 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6452
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 30, 1941·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Defendant appeals from a judgment of a city magistrate, holding a Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, convicting him of a violation of sections 643a-9.0 and C26-207.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York. Judgment unanimously afSrmed. The question of the illegality of the order revoking the defendant’s permit may not be reviewed in a prosecution for failure to comply with an administrative order. (City of New York v. Wineburgh Advertising Co., 122 App. Div. 748; City of New York v. Wineburgh Advertising Co., 124 id. 641.) The proper forum to test that question is provided for in section 666, subdivision 6, of the New York City Charter, effective January 1, 1938. (See Matter of Towers Management Corp. v. Thatcher, 271 N. Y. 94.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ludwig, 262 A.D. 912, 28 N.Y.S.2d 831, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6452 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

262 A.D. 912 (People v. Ludwig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Looe
51 Misc. 2d 835 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1966)
People v. Namro Holding Corp.
10 A.D.2d 702 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
People v. Gillman
6 A.D.2d 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
People v. 70 Realty Corp.
192 Misc. 122 (New York City Magistrates' Court, 1948)
People v. Gerus
19 Misc. 2d 389 (New York County Courts, 1942)