People v. Luciano
This text of 251 A.D. 887 (People v. Luciano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Judgments and orders affirmed. No opinion.
Martin, P. J., Dore and Callahan, JJ., concur; Untermyer, J., concurs in the affirmance of the judgments as to all defendants, except as to the sentences, which he is of opinion are excessive and should be reduced; and also votes to modify the order, denying the motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence as to the defendant Luciano. Opinion by Untermyer, J. Cohn, J., votes for affirmance of the judgments as to all defendants but concurs with Untermyer, J., with respect to the motion for a new trial. Present—■ Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D. 887, 298 N.Y.S. 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-luciano-nyappdiv-1937.