People v. Lucas

243 A.D.2d 731, 665 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10741
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 27, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silverman, J.), imposed November 19, 1996, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant waived his right to appeal as part of the negotiated plea agreement (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Nevertheless, we have considered the defendant’s contention that the sentence was unduly harsh and excessive, and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lucas, 243 A.D.2d 731, 665 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10741 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

243 A.D.2d 731 (People v. Lucas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Diaz
254 A.D.2d 367 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Pratt
248 A.D.2d 409 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)