People v. Lucas

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Lucas

269 N.E.2d 914, 28 N.Y.2d 761, 321 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1404

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 8, 1971

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 269 N.E.2d 914 (People v. Lucas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lucas, 269 N.E.2d 914, 28 N.Y.2d 761, 321 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1404 (N.Y. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Concur: Chief Judge Euld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Jasen and Gibson. Judge Bkeitel dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial on the grounds that the cross-examination of the witness Adderly was improperly curtailed, and that it was an abuse of discretion to deny the defendant adjournments in order to obtain mental hospital records concerning the witness Adderly and to refuse to permit the calling of Ulysses Bryant as a witness, all of which rendered the trial unfair.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Concur: Chief Judge Euld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Jasen and Gibson. Judge Bkeitel dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial on the grounds that the cross-examination of the witness Adderly was improperly curtailed, and that it was an abuse of discretion to deny the defendant adjournments in order to obtain mental hospital records concerning the witness Adderly and to refuse to permit the calling of Ulysses Bryant as a witness, all of which rendered the trial unfair.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 N.E.2d 914, 28 N.Y.2d 761, 321 N.Y.S.2d 371, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lucas-ny-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack