People v. Luc (Marcelino)
Opinion
against
Marcelino Luc, Appellant.
New York City Legal Aid Society (Joanne Legano Ross of counsel), for appellant. Queens County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).
Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Bruna L. DiBiase, J.), rendered October 16, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of disorderly conduct (Penal Law § 240.20). Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.
ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: October 26, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Luc (Marcelino) (People v. Luc (Marcelino)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.