People v. Lozano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lozano

2017 NY Slip Op 610, 146 A.D.3d 732, 45 N.Y.S.3d 788

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 31, 2017·No. 2956 5527N/13·Published

Opinion

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Sonberg, J.), rendered February 3, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Saxe and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Sonberg, J.), rendered February 3, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Saxe and Gische, JJ.

People v. Lozano, 2017 NY Slip Op 610, 146 A.D.3d 732, 45 N.Y.S.3d 788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

2017 NY Slip Op 610 (People v. Lozano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.