People v. Lowry

184 Misc. 2d 306, 708 N.Y.S.2d 811, 2000 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 191
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 10, 2000·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed on the law, appearance ticket dismissed and fine remitted.

The “information” in the case at bar is in fact an appearance ticket. An appearance ticket is not an accusatory instrument and does not give a court jurisdiction over a defendant. Thus, the failure to file with the court a proper accusatory instru[307] ment mandates reversal and dismissal of the appearance ticket (see, People v Cooperman, NYLJ, Jan. 17, 1989, at 26, col 4 [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists]). Additionally, even if we consider the appearance ticket an information, it would have to be dismissed as being jurisdictionally defective as it failed to describe with any degree of specificity the facts which constituted the violation and failed to contain a statement setting forth defendant’s relationship to the property (see, CPL 100.40 [1]; 100.15; see also, People v Alejandro, 70 NY2d 133).

DiPaola, P. J., Floyd and Palella, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lowry, 184 Misc. 2d 306, 708 N.Y.S.2d 811, 2000 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

184 Misc. 2d 306 (People v. Lowry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gantz (Joseph)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018
People v. Plateau Associates LLC
38 Misc. 3d 770 (New York Town and Village Courts, 2012)
People v. Braun Bros. Brushes
15 Misc. 3d 1030 (Valley Stream Justice Court, 2007)