People v. Lowe
This text of 906 N.E.2d 1057 (People v. Lowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
*769 The lower courts’ determinations of probable cause, a mixed question of law and fact, are supported by the minutes of the in camera hearing conducted pursuant to People v Darden (34 NY2d 177 [1974]), and are thus beyond our further review. Accordingly, defendant’s motion to suppress was properly denied.
We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.
Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur; Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
906 N.E.2d 1057, 12 N.Y.3d 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lowe-ny-2009.