People v. Lovejoy

105 A.D.2d 807, 481 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20926
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered July 14, 1983, convicting him of two counts of robbery in the first degree, two counts of robbery in the second degree, kidnapping in the second degree, assault in the second degree and grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Although the prosecutor should not have elicited hearsay testimony regarding an uncharged crime (the breaking of a windshield), prompt curative instructions alleviated any possibility of prejudice (People v Santiago, 52 NY2d 865). In addition [808]*808thereto, we note that defense counsel subsequently elicited testimony regarding the uncharged crime.

Defendant’s other contentions have been considered and have been found to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Thompson and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lovejoy, 105 A.D.2d 807, 481 N.Y.S.2d 437, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

105 A.D.2d 807 (People v. Lovejoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Diaz
122 A.D.2d 279 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)