People v. Louis

2019 NY Slip Op 2119
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 20, 2019
DocketInd. No. 257/16
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 2119 (People v. Louis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Louis, 2019 NY Slip Op 2119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Louis (2019 NY Slip Op 02119)
People v Louis
2019 NY Slip Op 02119
Decided on March 20, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 20, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2017-04996
(Ind. No. 257/16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Emmanuel Louis, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Lauren E. Jones of counsel), for appellant.

Michael E. McMahon, District Attorney, Staten Island, NY (Morrie I. Kleinbart and Alexander Fumelli of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (William Garnett, J.), rendered March 30, 2017, convicting him of attempted robbery in the third degree and attempted assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to consecutive indeterminate terms of imprisonment 1½ to 3 years on each conviction.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by providing that the sentences imposed shall run concurrently with each other; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

As the People correctly concede, the sentence imposed upon the defendant's conviction of attempted assault in the second degree must be modified to run concurrently with the sentence imposed upon the conviction of attempted robbery in the third degree (see Penal Law § 70.25[2]; People v Parks, 95 NY2d 811, 814-815; People v Nicholson, 101 AD3d 904, 905; People v Malone, 51 AD3d 693; People v Tucker, 33 AD3d 635, 636).

DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Parks
734 N.E.2d 741 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
People v. Tucker
33 A.D.3d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Malone
51 A.D.3d 693 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Nicholson
101 A.D.3d 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 2119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-louis-nyappdiv-2019.