People v. Louis

305 A.D.2d 699, 759 N.Y.S.2d 693
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Louis. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 A.D.3d 592

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), rendered January 8, 2001, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions that the prosecutor engaged in prejudicial conduct in cross-examining him and on summation are largely unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Rupnarain, 299 AD2d 498 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 619 [2003]; People v Morel, 297 AD2d 757 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 561 [2002]). In any event, the allegedly improper conduct did not result in reversible error (see People v Hunte, 276 AD2d 717 [2000]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, S. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Louis, 305 A.D.2d 699, 759 N.Y.S.2d 693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

305 A.D.2d 699 (People v. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Hunte
276 A.D.2d 717 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Morel
297 A.D.2d 757 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)