People v. Lou

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lou

244 A.D.2d 360, 665 N.Y.S.2d 326, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10957

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 3, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 244 A.D.2d 360 (People v. Lou) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lou, 244 A.D.2d 360, 665 N.Y.S.2d 326, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Katz, J.), rendered May 13, 1992, convicting him of attempted burglary in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

[361]*361Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s statements “were made after [he] had been advised of his Miranda rights, and the totality of the circumstances indicate that they were voluntarily made” (People v Calix, 236 AD2d 550, 551; see, People v Sohn, 148 AD2d 553; see also, People v Stevens, 223 AD2d 609; People v Williams, 222 AD2d 468; People v Jordan, 216 AD2d 489; People v Hamilton, 199 AD2d 415).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Joy, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Katz, J.), rendered May 13, 1992, convicting him of attempted burglary in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

[361]*361Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s statements “were made after [he] had been advised of his Miranda rights, and the totality of the circumstances indicate that they were voluntarily made” (People v Calix, 236 AD2d 550, 551; see, People v Sohn, 148 AD2d 553; see also, People v Stevens, 223 AD2d 609; People v Williams, 222 AD2d 468; People v Jordan, 216 AD2d 489; People v Hamilton, 199 AD2d 415).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Joy, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D.2d 360, 665 N.Y.S.2d 326, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lou-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack