People v. Lorick

59 A.D.3d 567, 872 N.Y.S.2d 295
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 10, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 A.D.3d 567 (People v. Lorick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lorick, 59 A.D.3d 567, 872 N.Y.S.2d 295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered December 6, 2005, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Orange County, for further proceedings.

The plea minutes reveal that the defendant was not informed, prior to entering his plea, that his sentence would necessarily include a period of postrelease supervision. Therefore, the plea must be vacated (see People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541 [2007]; People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 245 [2005]; People v Bernard, 53 AD3d 586 [568]*568[2008]; People v Cook, 49 AD3d 777 [2008]; People v Thompson, 47 AD3d 648 [2008]).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the defendant’s remaining contention that the sentence was excessive. Skelos, J.E, Dillon, Garni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Puntervold
60 A.D.3d 1090 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 A.D.3d 567, 872 N.Y.S.2d 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lorick-nyappdiv-2009.