People v. Lopez

2016 NY Slip Op 6972, 143 A.D.3d 613, 39 N.Y.S.3d 760
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lopez. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 A.D.3d 1190
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 25, 2016·No. 2029 5536/13·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J.), rendered October 10, 2014, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of four years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the prison term to three years, and otherwise affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and identification, including its evaluation of alleged discrepancies between an officer’s description of defendant and his actual appearance.

We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated.

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Saxe, Feinman and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lopez, 2016 NY Slip Op 6972, 143 A.D.3d 613, 39 N.Y.S.3d 760 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 6972 (People v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)